<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sacred 3 Preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thegamershub.net/2012/08/sacred-3-preview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thegamershub.net/2012/08/sacred-3-preview/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:32:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbarian</title>
		<link>http://thegamershub.net/2012/08/sacred-3-preview/#comment-20211</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegamershub.net/?p=55321#comment-20211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;While co-op is only for use online to ensure frame rate remains consistently high...&quot;

Very disappointed. Sacred 2 at least had 2-player local. I was really hoping for 4-player local. I guess it&#039;s back to the PS2 for some Champions RTA. Too bad developers always claim this console generation is too underpowered to allow local multiplayer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;While co-op is only for use online to ensure frame rate remains consistently high&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Very disappointed. Sacred 2 at least had 2-player local. I was really hoping for 4-player local. I guess it&#8217;s back to the PS2 for some Champions RTA. Too bad developers always claim this console generation is too underpowered to allow local multiplayer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
